#### FRANK WOOD v. THE TOWN OF EDENTON.

Municipal Taxation — Solvent Credits.

All notes, bonds, &c., owned by a resident of a municipality, whether owing by residents or non-residents, are subjects of municipal taxation.

(See syllabus in preceding case.)

*152This was a civil ACTION, instituted before a Justice of the Peace, and carried, by appeal, to the Superior Court of Chowan County, and tried before Boykin, J., at Spring Term, 1889, of that Court, upon the following facls agreed:

1. That the defendant is a duly incorporated town, and authorized under its charter (ch. 123, Private Laws of North Carolina, 1869 and 1870) to annually levy and collect taxes “ on all real and personal estate within said town,” etc.

2. The plaintiff is a resident of said town, and, on the_ dajr of June, 1888, he listed for taxation, before the proper list-taker of Chowan County, the notes, bonds and solvent credits owned by him and in his possession, amounting to $17,000, and the councilmen of the town of Edenton took the same from the said county list and levied a tax of one-half of one per cent, upon said notes, bonds and solvent credits, and collected from the plaintiff thereon the sum of $85, which the plaintiff paid under protest.

3. That of the notes, bonds, etc., so levied upon, $4,000 worth were against persons living in town, and secured by deeds of trust upon property in said town, and $13,000 worth against non-residents of the town, and secured by property not located in said town.

4. The plaintiff demanded said amount, in thirty’ days, of the Treasurer of said town, which being refused, he, after ninety days, brought this action, and otherwise complied with the requirements of chapter 137, Laws of 1887.

The Court gave the following judgment:

“This cause coming to be heard upon appeal of plaintiff from a judgment rendered by PI. DeB. Hooper, J. P., and being heard and considered by the foregoing facts agreed, it is adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of sixty-five dollars, being one-half of one per cent, collected by the defendant of the plaintiff upon thirteen thousand dollars of bonds against non-residents of Edenton, and secured by mortgage upon lands out*153side the corporate limits of the said town, together with the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk.”

The defendant excepted, and appealed to this Court.

Mr. W. D. Pruden, for the plaintiff.

Mr. Charles M. Busbee, for the defendant.

Shephehd, J.:

For the reasons given in the case of Redmond v. The Commissioners of Tarboro, ante, 122, the judgment below is reversed.

All notes, bonds, &c., whether owing by residents or nonresidents, are subjects of municipal taxation.

Judgment reversed.