{
  "id": 8650251,
  "name": "HUGH J. LOVIC v. THE PROVIDENCE LIFE INSURANCE CO.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lovic v. Providence Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1891-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "302",
  "last_page": "303",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "109 N.C. 302"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "104 N. C., 914",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652739
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/104/0914-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "108 N. C., 266",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650552
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/108/0266-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1446,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20758488236186742
    },
    "sha256": "efebc0f9cf4fc42164c78bf975811d2adf017d73e3b6c3b2a32bfd3158b96ba6",
    "simhash": "1:136da08e7ee244c4",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:47:39.876308+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HUGH J. LOVIC v. THE PROVIDENCE LIFE INSURANCE CO."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Davis, J.:\nThere is no statement of the case on appeal, and no exceptions or assignment of- error appear in the record, nor is there anything in the voluminous transcript sent to this Court to show that either party was dissatisfied with anything that occurred in the progress of the trial, or that any appeal was taken, except the following entry at the close of the judgment: \u201c From the foregoing judgment the plaintiff and defendant appeal; notice waived; bond fixed at $25;\u201d and, \u201cit is agreed that either party have until May 1st, 1891, to file case on appeal and perfect appeal. April 4th, 1891.\u201d This agreement is signed by counsel for both sides. Only one transcript is sent up, and there is nothing to indicate whether it is the appeal of the plaintiff or defendant, \u2022except the Clerk\u2019s certificate of deposit of $25 in cash made by the defendant in lieu of an appeal bond. No appeal has been perfected as required by The Code, or in accordance with the agreement of the parties, and the judgment must be affirmed. Mitchell v. Tedder, 108 N. C., 266; State v. Henry, 104 N. C., 914.\n\u2022Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Davis, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. O. H. Quion, for plaintiff.",
      "Mr. M. I)eW. Stevenson, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HUGH J. LOVIC v. THE PROVIDENCE LIFE INSURANCE CO.\nAppeal \u2014 Record.\nWhere there is no statement of case on appeal, or assignment of error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.\nCivil ACTION, tried at February Term, 1891, of CraveN Superior Court, before Connor, J.\nMr. O. H. Quion, for plaintiff.\nMr. M. I)eW. Stevenson, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0302-01",
  "first_page_order": 336,
  "last_page_order": 337
}