{
  "id": 8650292,
  "name": "W. J. WYATT v. LYNCHBURG AND DURHAM RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1891-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "306",
  "last_page": "307",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "109 N.C. 306"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "90 N. C., 649",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8698603
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/90/0649-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "95 N. C., 134",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273278
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/95/0134-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1025,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.4033266686372354e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34068627167066495
    },
    "sha256": "1c2a427dbe9d0553c03769fb9f27748fe39e0ca51dfd41c3bc2d2b65951bbde2",
    "simhash": "1:8201ff289242bc1f",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:47:39.876308+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. J. WYATT v. LYNCHBURG AND DURHAM RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Clark, J.:\nThe transcript shows process, a reference to arbitration, an award, exception thereto, the action of the Court below thereon and an appeal, but there are no pleadings nor an agreed state of facts in lieu thereof, that we might see the contention of the parties, and that the Court below had jurisdiction of the cause of action.\nThe Court would permit the pleadings to be filed in this Court nunc pro tunc (Rule 26), so as not to delay the hearing, but as both parties are not able to do this, the cause must be remanded. The case is substantially the same as Daniel v. Rogers, 95 N. C., 134; Rowland v. Mitchell, 90 N. C., 649.\nRemanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Clark, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. J. W. Graham, J. Parker, R. B. Boone and J. 8. Manning, for plaintiff.",
      "Mr. W. A. Guthrie, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. J. WYATT v. LYNCHBURG AND DURHAM RAILROAD COMPANY.\nAppeal\u2014 Transcript.\nWhen the record on appeal does not set forth the pleadings, nor an agreed state of facts in lieu thereof, the cause will be remanded.\nAppeal from Fall Term, 1891, of Durham Superior Court.\nMessrs. J. W. Graham, J. Parker, R. B. Boone and J. 8. Manning, for plaintiff.\nMr. W. A. Guthrie, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0306-01",
  "first_page_order": 340,
  "last_page_order": 341
}