{
  "id": 8681138,
  "name": "Chairman of Mecklenburg County Court, to the use of M'Bride, v. Clark and Springs",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chairman of Mecklenburg County Court ex rel. M'Bride v. Clark",
  "decision_date": "1825-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "43",
  "last_page": "43",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "4 Hawks 43"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 N.C. 43"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1221,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.429,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0993038655706752e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7614893764076592
    },
    "sha256": "5bf2b70ca8c8079d8790f0ba9efe6d7ac6635cfe4101841e46ac6642747a6202",
    "simhash": "1:e8f9d110b8083bfc",
    "word_count": 200
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:54:05.914264+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chairman of Mecklenburg County Court, to the use of M\u2019Bride, v. Clark and Springs."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curi-am. \u2014\nThis case presents the precise question that was made in M\u2018Kellar v. Bowers, decided at this term. In that case the Superior Court rejected the evidence properly; in this case it was erroneously admitted. The judgment here must consequently be reversV ed.\nJUDGMERT REVERSED;",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curi-am. \u2014"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chairman of Mecklenburg County Court, to the use of M\u2019Bride, v. Clark and Springs.\nFrom Mecklenburg.\nThe record of a recovery by the creditor of an intestate against his administrator, is not evidence in a suit by the creditor against the securities of the administrator.\nThis was an action of debt on an administration bond, tried below, before Nash, Judge; and on the trial it appeared that George Hampton bad been appointed administrator to the estate of Thomas Henderson, and entered into bond with the defendants as his sureties. M* Bride, a creditor of Henderson, had sued Hampton and recovered judgment, which was unsatisfied. Hampton being insolvent; and in this suit McBride was permitted to offer as prima facie evidence, the record of the recovery against Hampton. The admission of this testimony formed the ground of a motion for a new trial; and defendants contended also, that this action would not lie against them."
  },
  "file_name": "0043-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 47
}