{
  "id": 11273920,
  "name": "E. J. PIPKIN, Guardian v. J. A. GREEN, Sheriff of Harnett County",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pipkin v. Green",
  "decision_date": "1892-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "462",
  "last_page": "462",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "110 N.C. 462"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "109 N. C., 207",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8649903
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/109/0207-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "108 N. C., 412",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650958
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/108/0412-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "107 N. C., 326",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273414
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/107/0326-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 716,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.581,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.43890242249644673
    },
    "sha256": "345cfdf20217ffa27f5dd3327d7f3533912fd6e4c22e4e0249c88b5510e4ed84",
    "simhash": "1:aa3805e66029b935",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:14:37.916120+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. J. PIPKIN, Guardian v. J. A. GREEN, Sheriff of Harnett County."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis case was tried at November Term, 1890. It should have stood for argument here at Spring Term, 1891. In August, 1891, the appellant agreed to take no advantage of appellee\u2019s delay till then to serve a counter-case. But this did not release appellant from the duty of docketing case here at Fall Term, 1891. The case, however, was not docketed till February Term, 1892; nor is it printed. The motion to dismiss should be allowed. In re Berry, 107 N. C., 326; Hinton v. Pritchard, 108 N. C., 412; Johnston v. Whitehead, 109 N. C., 207.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. E. C. Smith, for appellee.",
      "No counsel, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "E. J. PIPKIN, Guardian v. J. A. GREEN, Sheriff of Harnett County.\nMr. E. C. Smith, for appellee.\nNo counsel, contra.\nMotion of appellee to dismiss."
  },
  "file_name": "0462-01",
  "first_page_order": 490,
  "last_page_order": 490
}