{
  "id": 8650775,
  "name": "P. D. BROADWELL v. C. B. RAY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Broadwell v. Ray",
  "decision_date": "1893-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "191",
  "last_page": "192",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "112 N.C. 191"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "111 N. C., 457",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651618
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/111/0457-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "109 N. C., 822",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651744
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/109/0822-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "105 N. C., 127",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652350
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/105/0127-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "111 N. C., 457",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651618
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/111/0457-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 1164,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.467,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2075902880824326
    },
    "sha256": "6a850b678fc304493a10b39caebc47254b8e4d2b7bd461351328fb75acb75c0f",
    "simhash": "1:b52e585584b97459",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:52:34.318959+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "P. D. BROADWELL v. C. B. RAY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nA certiorari was granted in this case, 111 N. C., 457. To this the Clerk of Wake Superior Court returns that the defendant failed to perfect his appeal or to pay fees for a transcript of the record, though demanded.\nThe appeal must be dismissed. Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127; State v. Nash, 109 N. C., 822.\nAppeal Dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. W. H. Pace, for petitioner.",
      "Mr. 8. G. Ryan, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "P. D. BROADWELL v. C. B. RAY.\nCertiorari \u2014 Appeal\u2014Dismissal.\nWhere a certiorari has been granted to an appellant to complete the record by supplying material evidence that had been omitted from the case as settled, but the Clerk of the Superior Court returns that appellant failed to perfect his appeal, or to pay fees for a transcript of the record, though demanded, the appeaL will be dismissed. .\nActioN by P. D. Broadwell against C. B. Ray. From the judgment defendant appealed, and, material evidence having been omitted from the case as settled, he was granted a certiorari to complete the record. To this the Clerk returns that defendant failed to perfect his appeal or to pay fees for a transcript of the record.\nFor prior report, see 111 N. C., 457.\nMr. W. H. Pace, for petitioner.\nMr. 8. G. Ryan, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0191-02",
  "first_page_order": 223,
  "last_page_order": 224
}