{
  "id": 8652050,
  "name": "LIZZIE C. NEAL v. OLD NORTH STATE LAND COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neal v. Old North State Land Co.",
  "decision_date": "1893-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "841",
  "last_page": "841",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "112 N.C. 841"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "109 N. C., 83",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8649274
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/109/0083-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 1101,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.434,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.114690476913653e-07,
      "percentile": 0.571632554639286
    },
    "sha256": "a75f1d85dbb943e2c892e256ff8ee2a7daba25dcbce3d05391abed4da0bbe1f7",
    "simhash": "1:dd5017cfc558b9d0",
    "word_count": 196
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:52:34.318959+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LIZZIE C. NEAL v. OLD NORTH STATE LAND COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Ouriaji :\nThe additional explanatory affidavit of the Clerk does not alter the case. The motion to re-instate must he denied. The neglect of counsel to have the record printed is the neglect of the party himself and does not excuse. Edwards v. Henderson, 109 N. C., 83, and numerous cases there cited. In that case it is said: \u201cAppellants might as well fail to send up the transcript as not to have it in a condition to be heard by failing to have the 'case and exceptions\u2019 printed.\u201d\nMotion Denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Ouriaji :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. F. Morphew, for appellant.",
      "Mr. P. J. Sinclair, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LIZZIE C. NEAL v. OLD NORTH STATE LAND COMPANY.\nDismissal of Appeal \u2014 Motion to Reinstate \u2014 Neglect of Counsel.\nWhere an appeal has been dismissed for failure to print the record a motion to re-instate will not bo allowed on the ground that such failure was caused by the neglect of counsel, for the neglect of counsel is the neglect of the party himself and does not excuse.\nThe appeal in this case having on motion been dismissed for failure to print the record, the appellant, after notice given, moved to re-instate the same.\nMr. J. F. Morphew, for appellant.\nMr. P. J. Sinclair, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0841-01",
  "first_page_order": 873,
  "last_page_order": 873
}