{
  "id": 8649783,
  "name": "AUGUSTUS MAGGETT v. E. E. ROBERTS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Maggett v. Roberts",
  "decision_date": "1894-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "227",
  "last_page": "227",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "114 N.C. 227"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 632,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.49,
    "sha256": "5b14009b194fe3274d3efca162e05b3579e335bc0635f4d279c9e07d03338519",
    "simhash": "1:1c20b05fbe440c4f",
    "word_count": 105
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:42.198773+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "AUGUSTUS MAGGETT v. E. E. ROBERTS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nBecause there is in the record no case on appeal and no error appears on the record proper, the judgment is Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. P. B. Peebles, for plaintiff.",
      "No counsel contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "AUGUSTUS MAGGETT v. E. E. ROBERTS.\nPractice\u25a0 \u2014 -Case on Appeal, absence of \u2014 Affirmation of Judgment.\nWhere no case on appeal accompanies the record and no error is apparent on the face of the latter, the judgment below will be affirmed.\nAppeal by defendant from judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in an action tried before Whitaker, J; at December Special Term, 1893, of Northamptok Superior Court.\nNo-case on appeal accompanies the record.\nMr. P. B. Peebles, for plaintiff.\nNo counsel contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0227-01",
  "first_page_order": 255,
  "last_page_order": 255
}