{
  "id": 8656043,
  "name": "STATE v. B. L. PAGE et el.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Page",
  "decision_date": "1895-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "1016",
  "last_page": "1016",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "116 N.C. 1016"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 938,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.392552054677732e-08,
      "percentile": 0.27578943791703686
    },
    "sha256": "a966780baff7c5f56e4564f1f7fafe1466956ee56c1315823f2505b8c034e747",
    "simhash": "1:142f8d1423fd0804",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:04:38.706573+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. B. L. PAGE et el."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Faikcloth, C. J.:\nThe defendants made no exception to the admission of evidence nor to His Honor\u2019s charge. After verdict and rule for new trial discharged, the case states that \u201c defendants excepted,\u201d but does not specify anything to which the defendants excepted. We have examined the record and find no error th\u00e9rein.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Faikcloth, C. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "The Attorney General, for the State.",
      "No counsel, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. B. L. PAGE et el.\nPractice \u2014 Failure to Except Until After Verdict \u2014 Appeal.\nWhere defendant in a criminal action made no exception to the evidence or instructions to the jury but after conviction and refusal of motion for new trial \u201c excepted\u201d without specifying anything to which he excepted, the judgment will be affirmed when no error appears on the record.\nIndictment against B. L. Page et ad for assault and battery, tried before Whitaher, F, at Spring Term, 1894, of RobesoN Superior Court. The defendants were convicted and appealed.\nThe Attorney General, for the State.\nNo counsel, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "1016-01",
  "first_page_order": 1044,
  "last_page_order": 1044
}