{
  "id": 8653216,
  "name": "PRIMUS HOLMES v. LUCIEN BREWER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Holmes v. Brewer",
  "decision_date": "1895-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "347",
  "last_page": "347",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "117 N.C. 347"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 908,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "sha256": "76882a86414a9edf77b85661577025cccafbee6f173843025c972a430ae29a10",
    "simhash": "1:490374a01fccb872",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:25:58.395701+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PRIMUS HOLMES v. LUCIEN BREWER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Faircloth, C. J.:\nThe defendant has exercised bis right of appeal for tbe pleasure of continuing litigation, or with tbe hope that something might \u201cturn up\u201d which he could not then foresee, on the theory that accidents will sometimes happen. No error was called to our attention and on careful examination of the record we are unable to see any. The errors assigned are all overruled.\nJudgment Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Faircloth, C. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Black & Adams and Mr. W. JE. Murchison, for plaintiff.",
      "Messrs. Douglass <& Spence, for defendant (appellant)."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PRIMUS HOLMES v. LUCIEN BREWER.\nPractice \u2014 Affirmance of Judgment.\nWhen no error is called to the attention of this Court on appeal, and none appears on the record, the judgment below will be affirmed.\nCivil aotioN for tbe recovery of land, tried before PLoke, J., and a jury, at August Term, 1895, of Moobe Superior Court. Tbeie was a verdict for the plaintiff and defendant appealed.\nMessrs. Black & Adams and Mr. W. JE. Murchison, for plaintiff.\nMessrs. Douglass <& Spence, for defendant (appellant)."
  },
  "file_name": "0347-01",
  "first_page_order": 375,
  "last_page_order": 375
}