{
  "id": 8653218,
  "name": "WROUGHT IRON RANGE CO. v. W. S. COZART",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wrought Iron Range Co. v. Cozart",
  "decision_date": "1896-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "342",
  "last_page": "343",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "118 N.C. 342"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 560,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.447,
    "sha256": "e5d81df9d02b1c812c8de43a1109f37bf03af2741cf47adc36ca710924573734",
    "simhash": "1:ab4afeed0d06f716",
    "word_count": 100
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:06.557243+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WROUGHT IRON RANGE CO. v. W. S. COZART."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Furches, J.:\nThis case is governed by the opinion in the above case against Garver. But /it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved, and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the state tax imposed by Section 28, Oh. 116, of the Laws of 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error and the judgment is reversed.\nEe versed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Furches, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Shepherd & Buslee and A. A. Hicks, for plaintiff.",
      "Mr. W. A. Guthrie, for defendant (appellant)."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WROUGHT IRON RANGE CO. v. W. S. COZART.\nMessrs. Shepherd & Buslee and A. A. Hicks, for plaintiff.\nMr. W. A. Guthrie, for defendant (appellant)."
  },
  "file_name": "0342-01",
  "first_page_order": 378,
  "last_page_order": 379
}