{
  "id": 8654265,
  "name": "AMOS GWINN, et al. v. L. S. PARKER, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gwinn v. Parker",
  "decision_date": "1896-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "19",
  "last_page": "19",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "119 N.C. 19"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "93 N. C., 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273006
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/93/0188-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "86 N. C., 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11272629
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/86/0020-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1308,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.462,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.811549079695343e-07,
      "percentile": 0.931576512761941
    },
    "sha256": "bd85b5daed49bddf02148cbbd08a6c51a3ee7c71283eb23d61a106d11ddb36bc",
    "simhash": "1:340946b0145ebc5a",
    "word_count": 227
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:25:50.492694+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "AMOS GWINN, et al. v. L. S. PARKER, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "EaiRcloth, C. J.:\nThe plaintiff, having previously filed a complaint, on Thursday, Spring Term, 1896, obtained judgment for want of an answer. On the next day the Judge, on defendants\u2019 affidavit and application, set aside the judgment and allowed defendants 30 days to answer. Plaintiff appealed.\nIt has been the settled rule for some time that any order or decree made was, during the term, in fieri, and that the Court during the term could vacate or modify the same.\nThe Court has the discretion also, not reviewable, to extend the time for filing pleadings. Code, Sec. 274; Gilchrist v. Kitchen, 86 N. C., 20 ; Brown v. Hale, 93 N. C., 188. No Error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "EaiRcloth, C. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. E. F. Aydlett, for plaintiffs (appellants).",
      "Mr. R. 0. Burton, for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "AMOS GWINN, et al. v. L. S. PARKER, et al.\nPractice \u2014 Judgments in fieri During Term of 'Court\u2014 Discretionary Power of Judge to Extend Time for Filing Pleadings.\n1. Any order or decree made during a term of court is in fieri, and subject to be vacated or modified during such term.\n2. The exercise of the discretionary power of a court to extend time for filing pleadings is not reviewable.\nCivil aotioN, heard at Spring Term, 1896, of Gates Superior Court, before Robinson, J. The plaintiff appealed from the order referred to in the opinion of Chief Justice Faiboloth.\nMr. E. F. Aydlett, for plaintiffs (appellants).\nMr. R. 0. Burton, for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0019-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 47
}