{
  "id": 8656939,
  "name": "LUSK, et al., v. SAWYER, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lusk v. Sawyer",
  "decision_date": "1897-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "225",
  "last_page": "225",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "120 N.C. 225"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 261,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.475,
    "sha256": "f44070bace2d4de300748b934e10989ec7a9a4ddf319d9e928a07f038055e4ce",
    "simhash": "1:0a49f5608d8b0f4b",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:07:11.774475+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LUSK, et al., v. SAWYER, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nFor the reasons assigned in Wood v. Bellamy, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. A. 0. Avery and ,T. G. L. Harris, for plaintiffs (appellants).",
      "Messrs. R. 0. Burton and F. I. Osborne, for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LUSK, et al., v. SAWYER, et al.\nMessrs. A. 0. Avery and ,T. G. L. Harris, for plaintiffs (appellants).\nMessrs. R. 0. Burton and F. I. Osborne, for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0225-01",
  "first_page_order": 253,
  "last_page_order": 253
}