{
  "id": 8658123,
  "name": "J. W. BAILEY v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MITCHELL COUNTY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bailey v. Board of Commissioners",
  "decision_date": "1897-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "388",
  "last_page": "389",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "120 N.C. 388"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 969,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.427,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0189641752386648e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5446829139459483
    },
    "sha256": "e955ccec035eb0f4b866280117413c6aa5e762bf9d0b01329eecd78064cd95cf",
    "simhash": "1:81ba7a162ebd7c15",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:07:11.774475+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. BAILEY v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MITCHELL COUNTY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Gwriam:\nReversed. See The Code, Section 274.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Gwriam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. E. J. Justice, for defendants (appellants).",
      "No counsel, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. BAILEY v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MITCHELL COUNTY.\nPraeiiee \u2014 Filing Answer \u2014 Extension of Time \u2014 Discretion of Court.\nThe Court may, in its discretion, allow an answer to be filed after the expiration of the time limited therefor.\nCivil aotioN, heard before Norwood, J., at Fall Term, 1896, of Mitchell Superior Court, which was the Trial Term, for the action. The Judge holding the previous term of the court had allowed defendants sixty days to file answer and an extension had been granted by plaintiff\u2019s counsel, who wrote, \u201cYou must file it before court.\u201d The answer was filed on Tuesday of the first week of court, being the day on which the court was opened. ITis Honor gave judgment for want of an answer, holding, as a matter of law, that he had not the power, under the circumstances, to grant further time. The defendants appealed.\nMr. E. J. Justice, for defendants (appellants).\nNo counsel, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0388-01",
  "first_page_order": 416,
  "last_page_order": 417
}