{
  "id": 8658997,
  "name": "J. A. ARRINGDALE v. ENFIELD LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arringdale v. Enfield Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1897-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "488",
  "last_page": "488",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "120 N.C. 488"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 N. C., 549",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655648
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/119/0549-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 749,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.435,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2076798685946555
    },
    "sha256": "013f3c46eeb2c4efe2ebcddedc4202a4d3f8a90a9a6da9eee1d54ecc11bd6d87",
    "simhash": "1:cea4c6bc84d6e82f",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:07:11.774475+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. A. ARRINGDALE v. ENFIELD LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThere was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury. This case is governed by Mallonee v. Young, 119 N. C., 549.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. FI. G. Connor and MaoRae da Ray, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. T N. Hill and Rmid Bell, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. A. ARRINGDALE v. ENFIELD LUMBER COMPANY.\nBroker \u2014 Negotiating Sale\u2014 Commissions.\nA broker is not entitled to commissions on a sale unless he finds a purchaser in a situation and ready and willing to complete the purchase on the terms agreed upon between the broker and vendor.\nCivil actioN, tried before Robinson, J., and a j ury, at Rail Term, 1896, of Halifax Superior Court. The cause of action was a claim for commissions for sale of real estate for defendant. The plaintiff was non-suited and appealed.\nMessrs. FI. G. Connor and MaoRae da Ray, for appellant.\nMessrs. T N. Hill and Rmid Bell, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0488-01",
  "first_page_order": 516,
  "last_page_order": 516
}