{
  "id": 8652687,
  "name": "A. W. HAMER v. L. C. McCALL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hamer v. McCall",
  "decision_date": "1897-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "197",
  "last_page": "198",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "121 N.C. 197"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "68 N. C., 98",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "101 N. C., 538",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651093
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/101/0538-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1564,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.435,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20761113871889827
    },
    "sha256": "2e0cf9443d3952768ac3ac4e3540ef16d505b46ff781edabfc03d54c83bb2c4c",
    "simhash": "1:dea396f95165bc52",
    "word_count": 275
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:04:04.541275+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. W. HAMER v. L. C. McCALL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Furches, J.:\nThe merits of this action are discussed and determined in the above appeal by defendant in the same case.\nThis appeal, as we understand it, is from the judgment of the Superior Court refusing defendant\u2019s motion to set aside and vacate an execution and order of sale made loy the justice of the peace who tried the case. This is an original motion made in the Superior Court for the first time. The Court had no jurisdiction and the motion .was properly refused. Bailey v. Hester, 101 N. C., 538; Berdsey v. Harris, 68 N. C., 98.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Furches, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Walter II. Neal, for plaintiff.",
      "Mr. John I). Shaw, Jr., for defendant (appellant)."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. W. HAMER v. L. C. McCALL.\nPractice \u2014 Motion in Superior Court to set aside Magistrate\u2019s Execution and Order of Sale \u2014 Jurisdiction.\nThe Superior Court has no jurisdiction of an original motion to set aside an execution and order of sale granted by a Justice of the Peace.\nThe plaintiff obtained a judgment before a Justice of the Peace against the defendant,' as his tenant, for rents and .advances. The defendant appealed to the Superior Court but, having given no bond to stay execution, the Justice of the Peace issued execution and an order for the sale of the crops and other personal property subject to plaintiff\u2019s lien as landlord. At February Term, 1897, of Rioi-imoNd Superior Court, before Coble, J, the defendant made a motion to set aside the execution and order of sale and to require the Sheriff to pay over to him the fund in his hands arising from such sale. The motion was denied and defendant appealed.\nMr. Walter II. Neal, for plaintiff.\nMr. John I). Shaw, Jr., for defendant (appellant)."
  },
  "file_name": "0197-01",
  "first_page_order": 227,
  "last_page_order": 228
}