{
  "id": 8653298,
  "name": "WEATHERS & CROWDER v. J. S BORDERS and wife",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weathers v. Borders",
  "decision_date": "1897-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "387",
  "last_page": "388",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "121 N.C. 387"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 N. C., 323",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654975
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/119/0323-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "110 N. C., 70",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11272660
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/110/0070-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 196,
    "char_count": 2270,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.431,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.867030804716865e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4594522692249625
    },
    "sha256": "0c35834457f4f6d26c8a048a2bc2fd10ff002d574a681c045aab5dfa1708cfce",
    "simhash": "1:09f5d47a75134e75",
    "word_count": 385
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:04:04.541275+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WEATHERS & CROWDER v. J. S BORDERS and wife."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Faircloth, C. J.:\nDefendant and her husband contracted with plaintiffs verbally, to have a house built on her land and materials furnished for the building. The house was built and paid for except $37.81. Defendants, alleging that bad work was done and inferior material used, refused to pay the balance. Plaintiffs sue for balance and ask to have their judgment declared a lied on the house and lot. This is the only question. Plaintiffs admitted the- contract was not in writing and thereupdn his Honor held that they could not recover on their own showing and adjudged that the feme defendant go without day and that plaintiffs have judgment against the husband for the balance. Plaintiffs appealed from that part of the judgment dismissing the action as to the/eme defendant.\nIt has already been held that a wife cannot subject her land or separate interest therein, in any way, except by a regular conveyance executed as required by the Statute, and then the intent, to charge her separate estate must appear on the face of the instrument creating the liability.\nSlie may cliarge her personal estate by herself or by an agent, for her necessary personal expenses, or for the support of her family, or to pay her ante-nuptial debts, without the written assent of her husband, and may make him her agent to manage her separate estate. Code, Section 1826; Thompson v. Taylor, 110 N. C., 70; Loan Association v. Black, 119 N. C., 323; Bazemore v. Mountain, 121 N. C., at the present Term.\nShe cannot ratify a void contract. See second case cited supra. No error. Judgment affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Faircloth, C. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Webb & Webb for plaintiffs (appellants.)",
      "No counsel contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WEATHERS & CROWDER v. J. S BORDERS and wife.\nMechanic\u2019h Lien \u2014 Married Woman \u2014 Charge on Separate Estate.\nThe separate estate of a married woman is not subject to a lien for labor done or materials furnished for its improvement under a verbal contract of herself and husband.\nCivil action, begun in the Court of a Justice of the Peace to enforce a mechanic's and laborer\u2019s lien and heard on appeal before Nonoood, /., at Spring Term, 1897, of Cleveland Superior Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. From the judgment dismissing the action as to the feme defendant the plaintiffs appealed.\nMessrs. Webb & Webb for plaintiffs (appellants.)\nNo counsel contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0387-01",
  "first_page_order": 417,
  "last_page_order": 418
}