{
  "id": 8657015,
  "name": "JANE M. JONES v. ISAIAH BRINKLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jones v. Brinkley",
  "decision_date": "1898-03-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "62",
  "last_page": "63",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "122 N.C. 62"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "105 N. C., 333",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652762
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/105/0333-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 183,
    "char_count": 2094,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.457,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20766017632688238
    },
    "sha256": "a8f554792057e1f75047c904c62aeb4ca8d10fb50cde4f02b5838ccaa1d932ae",
    "simhash": "1:c8994c90c242ea54",
    "word_count": 372
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:06:10.161321+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JANE M. JONES v. ISAIAH BRINKLEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Fairoloth, 0. J.:\nWe have carefully examined the record in this case, but we are unable to give a satisfactory opinion on the questions which the parties probably intended. We shall have to direct a new trial for a better presentation of the matter. We refrain from considering the several matters referred to in the record, except in one particular, lest we might prejudice the rights of the parties on the next trial.\nThe complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of a certain tract of land in Gates County, and that the defendant has committed a trespass thereon. The description is very general, \u2018 \u2018containing 227 acres more or less.\u201d The answer denies that allegation. The first issue is as follows:\n1. \u201cIs the plaintiff the owner and in possession of the land described in the complaint?\u201d The jury answer \u201cYes, one half of 66 acres.\u201d\n2. \u201cDid the defendant trespass upon said land as alleged?\u2019 Ans. No.\u201d\nWe find a plat in the case, showing two grants under which the plaintiff and defendant claim, and these seem to overlap each other. In the complaint no mention of 66 acres is made, nor is any mention- of 66 acres made in the evidence, nor in the charge of the Court, nor in the case settled for this Court. Within the boundaries of each grant, the words \u201c66 acres\u201d are written, and no indication of the locality of the said 66 acres, nor any description thereof. In this condition of the case, we can only give a new trial. Allen v. Sallinger, 105 N. C., 333.\nNew trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Fairoloth, 0. J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. L. L. Smith, for plaintiff (appellant).",
      "Mr. E. F. Aydlett, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JANE M. JONES v. ISAIAH BRINKLEY.\n(Decided March 8, 1898).\nAppeal \u2014 Defective Findings \u2014 New Trial.\nWhere matter\u00bb intended to be pre.sented on an appeal do not sufficiently appear from the record so as to enable this Court to give a satisfactory opinion thereon, a new trial will be ordered.\nCivil Action to recover damages for an alleged trespass on land tried before Bryan, J., and a jury at Spring Term, 1897, of Gates Superior Court. There was a verdict for the defendant and from a judgment thereon the plaintiff appealed.\nMr. L. L. Smith, for plaintiff (appellant).\nMr. E. F. Aydlett, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0062-01",
  "first_page_order": 94,
  "last_page_order": 95
}