{
  "id": 8656965,
  "name": "LOVEY NICHOLSON v. COMMISSIONERS OF DARE COUNTY, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nicholson v. Commissioners of Dare County",
  "decision_date": "1898-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "15",
  "last_page": "15",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "123 N.C. 15"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "121 N. C., 27",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651993
      ],
      "opinion_index": 1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/121/0027-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "119 N. C., 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654279
      ],
      "opinion_index": 1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/119/0020-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "118 N. C., 30",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652460
      ],
      "opinion_index": 1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/118/0030-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 828,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20765940408108735
    },
    "sha256": "b421941ebf9d747c7e3e1acc14e466f38efab6754c2788342504be28c805f5fa",
    "simhash": "1:2a428c8400f377ce",
    "word_count": 148
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:57:12.442116+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LOVEY NICHOLSON v. COMMISSIONERS OF DARE COUNTY, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      },
      {
        "text": "Furches, J.,\ndissenting: This case is here for the fourth time. A majority of the Court have affirmed the judgment appealed from by a \u2018 \u2018per curiam\u2019\u2019\u2019 order. I cannot concur in this summary manner of disposing of this appeal. In my opinion it overrules all three of the former opinions of this Court, without giving any reason for doing so. If these opinions are erroneous and are overruled, the Court should have said so.\nI do not propose to discuss the case in this opinion. Were I to do so, it would be but to repeat the arguments contained in the opinions rendered upon former hearings and reported in 118 N. C., 30; 119 N. C., 20 and 121 N. C., 27.",
        "type": "dissent",
        "author": "Furches, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. W. B. Shaw, for plaintiff.",
      "Mr. E. F. Aydlett, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LOVEY NICHOLSON v. COMMISSIONERS OF DARE COUNTY, Appellants.\n(Decided October , 1898).\nMr. W. B. Shaw, for plaintiff.\nMr. E. F. Aydlett, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0015-01",
  "first_page_order": 41,
  "last_page_order": 41
}