{
  "id": 8657608,
  "name": "W. L. SLATER et al. v. J. P. STEWART et al, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Slater v. Stewart",
  "decision_date": "1898-10-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "112",
  "last_page": "113",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "123 N.C. 112"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 85,
    "char_count": 846,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "sha256": "a746ddc62938a09544f274ac4292604693154f11727ed96c997d3f6c89b4749a",
    "simhash": "1:337ae84f64473f2f",
    "word_count": 144
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:57:12.442116+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. L. SLATER et al. v. J. P. STEWART et al, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Porches, J.:\nThe facts governing this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Mahoney v. Stewart, at this Term. This was admitted by counsel on the argument here.\nThis being so, this case is governed by that case. Therefore, the injunction and order appointing a receiver are continued as to the defendant Stewart, but are dissolved and vacated as to the administrator Bras-well and the administration of his intestate\u2019s estate.\nThe judgment appealed from will be so modified, but the plaintiffs will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.\nModified and affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Porches, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. H. Cr. Connor, for appellants.",
      "Mr. Jacob Battle, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. L. SLATER et al. v. J. P. STEWART et al, Appellants.\n(Decided October 25, 1898).\nThis case from Edgecombe County is governed by the decision in Mahoney v. Stewart, at this Term, from Nash County.\nMr. H. Cr. Connor, for appellants.\nMr. Jacob Battle, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0112-01",
  "first_page_order": 138,
  "last_page_order": 139
}