{
  "id": 8661296,
  "name": "STATE v. DANIEL G. TAYLOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Taylor",
  "decision_date": "1899-03-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "803",
  "last_page": "803",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "124 N.C. 803"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "8 N. C., 53",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11275219
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/8/0053-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 863",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652286
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/94/0863-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "97 N. C., 489",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650951
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/97/0489-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 N. C., 53",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11275219
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/8/0053-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 916,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.475,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.0174949224532157e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8536563328595606
    },
    "sha256": "930fa4ce885732d3cac8918d1e4d336ae879366fbd4951a04d6036fa7d53be0b",
    "simhash": "1:882a4d5b88e35fa4",
    "word_count": 157
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:09:58.946028+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DANIEL G. TAYLOR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nRemanded for proper sentence. State v. Walters, 97 N. C., 489; State v. Johnson, 94 N. C., 863; State v. Kearney, 8 N. C., 53.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Simmons, Pou & Ward, for appellant.",
      "Attorney General for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DANIEL G. TAYLOR.\n(Decided March 21, 1899).\nCarrying Concealed Weapons \u2014 The Code, Section 1005\u2014 Construction \u2014 Penal Statute.\nIn a penal statute, '1 or \u201d will never be construed. 1! and,\u201d so as to make it more penal. State v. Kearney, 8 N. C., 53.\nINDICTMENT for carrying a concealed weapon, tried before Iiobinson, J., at November Term, 1898, of tbe Superior Court of Lenoie County.\nThe defendant pleaded guilty, and was adjudged to be imprisoned four months and pay a fine of $200 and costs. . The defendant excepted:\n1. That the judgment is \u00e9xcessive and contrary \u201e to the spirit of the Court .and the laxo.\n2. That his Honor erred in imposing both fine and imprisonment.\nDefendant appealed.\nMessrs. Simmons, Pou & Ward, for appellant.\nAttorney General for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0803-01",
  "first_page_order": 831,
  "last_page_order": 831
}