{
  "id": 8664850,
  "name": "Smith v. Railroad Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Railroad Co.",
  "decision_date": "1900-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "1153",
  "last_page": "1153",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "126 N.C. 1153"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 26,
    "char_count": 187,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.402,
    "sha256": "c570f746515150b7cc72baccf8436a8f7edc7b0ed0c7d680f19d6d68cf943499",
    "simhash": "1:5c2006a01008cb12",
    "word_count": 27
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:36:28.883277+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Smith v. Railroad Co.,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "from Mecklenburg County. Motion to docket and dismiss defendant\u2019s appeal under Rule 17, allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Burwell, Walker & Oansler for plaintiff; no counsel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Smith v. Railroad Co.,\nBurwell, Walker & Oansler for plaintiff; no counsel for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "1153-04",
  "first_page_order": 1193,
  "last_page_order": 1193
}