{
  "id": 11275148,
  "name": "STATE, Appellant, v. J. M. Pilkerton",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pilkerton",
  "decision_date": "1902",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "745",
  "last_page": "745",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "130 N.C. 745"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 302,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.495,
    "sha256": "00bbcca691b5da68daa6d4623d0fc012a049ae9c1fc6f5149b7ea3eeaa89233d",
    "simhash": "1:d0cf8738d5032a78",
    "word_count": 51
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:31:43.301896+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Douglas, J., dissenting."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE, Appellant, v. J. M. Pilkerton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee, Cueiam.\nEor the reasons set out in State v. Briggs et al., at this term, there was error in the judgment of the Court below, and there must be a new trial.\nEeversed.\nDouglas, J., dissenting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee, Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General, for State.",
      "Glenn, Manly & Pendren, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE, Appellant, v. J. M. Pilkerton.\nAttorney-General, for State.\nGlenn, Manly & Pendren, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0745-01",
  "first_page_order": 783,
  "last_page_order": 783
}