{
  "id": 8659229,
  "name": "ARNOLD v. DENNIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arnold v. Dennis",
  "decision_date": "1902-10-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "114",
  "last_page": "114",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "131 N.C. 114"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1250,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.424,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.206747897699882e-08,
      "percentile": 0.26805056974364144
    },
    "sha256": "4eccc3c3433fec528f8c3402a44c67a8144c3c6ac43906806661068cd73af21b",
    "simhash": "1:9e10211513bc4b90",
    "word_count": 225
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:56:51.027382+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ARNOLD v. DENNIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIn this case, made up by the counsel, we are unable to make a decision for want of a sufficient statement- of the facts. The plaintiffs allege a tenancy in common with the defendants, and pray fox a sale for partition. The defendants plead sole seizin. There is no evidence sent up, and the statement of the case fails to state in what relation the parties stand to each other or to the testator, or to the devisee, Nancy E. Thomas, named in the seventh item of the will, the construction of Avhicli seems, to have been the object of the appeal. The ease must be remanded for a fuller statement of the- facts to be brought out on a new trial.\nNew Trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Murchison & Johnson., for the plaintiffs.",
      "Stewari & Godwin, for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ARNOLD v. DENNIS.\n(Filed October 7, 1902.)\nAPPEAL \u2014 Case on Appeal \u2014 Statement of Facts \u2014 New Trial.\nWhere a case on appeal does not contain a sufficient statement of facts to enable tlie supreme court to make a decision, it will be remanded for a new trial.\nActioN by William Arnold and others against W. D. Dennis and others, heard by Judge W. 8. O\u2019B. Robinson, and a jury, at November Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of ITaeNEtt County. Rrom a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiffs, appealed.\nMurchison & Johnson., for the plaintiffs.\nStewari & Godwin, for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0114-01",
  "first_page_order": 152,
  "last_page_order": 152
}