#### S. R. EDNEY v. LAKE DRUMMOND CANAL & WATER CO. S. D. BURNHAM et al. v. LAKE DRUMMOND CANAL & WATER CO. *184S. R. EDNEY v. LAKE DRUMMOND CANAL & WATER CO.

*183(For head-notes and facts as to these two cases see Pinnix v. Canal Co. and Bullock v. Canal Co., at this term.)

G. W. Ward, for the plaintiff.

Pruden & Pruden and Shepherd & Shepherd, for the defendant.

No counsel for the plaintiff.

Pruden & Pruden and Shepherd & Shepherd, for the defendants.

*184(For head-notes and facts see cases of Pinnixv. Canal Co. and Bullock v. Canal Co., at this term.)

Pruden & Pruden and Shepherd & Shepherd, for the defendants.

Douglas, J.

These are two of the series of eases against the same defendant, which were argued together at this term with Pinnix v. Canal Co., and Bullock v. Canal Co.. As they are identical in legal principles and practically so in their material facts, no further discussion is deemed necessary. In both cases, the judgments of the court below are

Affirmed.