{
  "id": 8660114,
  "name": "SPRINKLE v. WELLBORN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sprinkle v. Wellborn",
  "decision_date": "1903-04-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "468",
  "last_page": "469",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "132 N.C. 468"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1210,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "998d40c6a82f6759961cc767cf69825312a764acba2d944e8d547c2532bc5cd2",
    "simhash": "1:2278f531983cbbd9",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:22:40.266480+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SPRINKLE v. WELLBORN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe court is unable to ascertain from the examination of the record in this case and the statement made by bis Honor, whether the defendant\u2019s counsel agreed that the finding of the first issue \u201cput an end to the case.\u201d In this condition of the record, we can do nothing but order a new trial to the end that if the cause should come to this court again the record may be in a condition which will enable us to bear and determine it upon exceptions properly presented.\nNeither party will recover any costs. The costs of this court will be divided between the parties.\nNew Trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. B. Finley, Womack & Hayes and Shepherd & Shepherd, for the plaintiff.",
      "Glenn, Manly & Hendren and W. W. Barber, for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SPRINKLE v. WELLBORN.\n(Filed April 28, 1903.)\nAPPEAL \u2014 Case on Appeal \u2014 New Trial.\nWhere the supreme court is unable to ascertain from the examination of the record and the statement made by the trial judge sufficient facts to enable the court to determine the case, a new trial will be ordered.\nActioN by Nancy E. Sprinkle against J. M. Wellborn and a jury, at May (Special) Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of WilKes County. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appealed.\nT. B. Finley, Womack & Hayes and Shepherd & Shepherd, for the plaintiff.\nGlenn, Manly & Hendren and W. W. Barber, for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0468-01",
  "first_page_order": 518,
  "last_page_order": 519
}