{
  "id": 8658701,
  "name": "Ammons (appellant) v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ammons v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1904",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "707",
  "last_page": "707",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "137 N.C. 707"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "131 N. C., 474",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 34,
    "char_count": 247,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.421,
    "sha256": "2d8e2df16de3fb73b57e795c7ac002fe1e91c91c0ba7520d7eea3d25987f4724",
    "simhash": "1:682613dc854788c3",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:47.205247+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ammons (appellant) v. Southern Railway Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is a motion to dismiss on same grounds as in Curtis\u2019 case, at this term, and is denied on the same grounds as stated in that case and in Benedict v. Jones, 131 N. C., 474. Motion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ammons (appellant) v. Southern Railway Co."
  },
  "file_name": "0707-01",
  "first_page_order": 741,
  "last_page_order": 741
}