{
  "id": 11253015,
  "name": "ALLEN v. RAILROAD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Allen v. Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1906-05-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "340",
  "last_page": "340",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "141 N.C. 340"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1498,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.474140541606369e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4454190186377661
    },
    "sha256": "1d3e533de32a6a3048a3a3936ffa6121655df5ecf344a520c5b414a87663f405",
    "simhash": "1:37d0a5c19a1b9f8e",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:33:26.736193+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ALLEN v. RAILROAD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe plaintiff\u2019s evidence was to the effect that the intestate walked on the railroad crossing and was killed by the defendant\u2019s train, and that the intestate at a point 20 yards from the crossing, by simply looking, could have seen down the railroad 200 yards in the direction from which the train approached. The testimony of the plaintiff further showed that the intestate did not look, listen or turn her head, and was paying no attention to the train. On this testimony, the court was clearly correct in giving an adverse intimation as to the plaintiff\u2019s right to recover.\nNo Error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Quinn & Hamrick for the plaintiff.",
      "Geo. F. Bason and W. B. Rodman for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALLEN v. RAILROAD.\n(Filed May 16, 1906).\nRailroads \u2014 Grossings\u20140ontribuiory Negligence.\nWhere the plaintiff\u2019s evidence was to the effect that his intestate walked on the railroad crossing and was killed by the defendant\u2019s train, and that the intestate at a point 20 yards from the crossing, by looking, could have seen down the railroad 200 yards in the direction from which the train approached, and that the intestate did not look, listen or turn her head, and was paying no attention to the train, the court was correct in giving an adverse intimation as to the plaintiff\u2019s right to recover.\nActioN by J. B. Allen, Administrator of M. A. Allen, deceased, against Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co., heard by Judge M. H. Justice and a jury, at the September Term, 1905, of the Superior Court of Cleveland.\nQuinn & Hamrick for the plaintiff.\nGeo. F. Bason and W. B. Rodman for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0340-01",
  "first_page_order": 370,
  "last_page_order": 370
}