{
  "id": 11254746,
  "name": "Cotton v. Manufacturing Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cotton v. Manufacturing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1906",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "876",
  "last_page": "876",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "141 N.C. 876"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 434,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "sha256": "f1c8825712c82b1b0d685b5235e5b4d50aca48c4ed3b49b2074744a525bc3a6e",
    "simhash": "1:96bf83e7b965a9aa",
    "word_count": 73
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:33:26.736193+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Walker, J., did not sit on the hearing of this appeal."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Cotton v. Manufacturing Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nOn examination of the entire record and the charge of the judge below, the court is of opinion that the case has been fairly presented to the jury and there is no substantial error which entitles the defendant to a new trial. No error.\nWalker, J., did not sit on the hearing of this appeal.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stewart & McRae for plaintiff, appellee; Tillett & Guthrie for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Cotton v. Manufacturing Co.\nFrom Mecklenburg.\nStewart & McRae for plaintiff, appellee; Tillett & Guthrie for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0876-01",
  "first_page_order": 906,
  "last_page_order": 906
}