{
  "id": 8658611,
  "name": "STATE v. MACK McGHEE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McGhee",
  "decision_date": "1907",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "640",
  "last_page": "640",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "143 N.C. 640"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 369,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.313947448607103e-08,
      "percentile": 0.27173591973895
    },
    "sha256": "724d395b63349d61ab0a89996a1c27414c72691d8479c7052503ed4ca0d3d35d",
    "simhash": "1:fd95662537b35ebe",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:13:26.496500+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. MACK McGHEE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Walker, J.\nThe facts in this case are substantially like those in State v. Hanner, and as the two cases present the same question, they were argued together. The decision in State v. Hanner must, therefore, govern in this case.\nNew Trial. \u2022",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Walker, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hayden Clement, Assistant Attorney-General, for State.",
      "Walser & Walser and J. A. Barringer for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. MACK McGHEE.\nHayden Clement, Assistant Attorney-General, for State.\nWalser & Walser and J. A. Barringer for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0640-01",
  "first_page_order": 680,
  "last_page_order": 680
}