{
  "id": 11253501,
  "name": "T. J. McDUFFIE and C. D. WOMACK v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDuffie v. Seaboard Air Line Railway",
  "decision_date": "1907-11-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "399",
  "last_page": "400",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "145 N.C. 399"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 777,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.455,
    "sha256": "7c9885003536b5158da7ca1ff0dd0bcc6ffcafc311738b2f82da232809ca136a",
    "simhash": "1:3a27f4961661d7b0",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:50:30.483289+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "T. J. McDUFFIE and C. D. WOMACK v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BbowN, J.\nTbe record discloses that tbe order for tbe car is dated 8 December, 1906, and requires that tbe empty car be furnished by 10 December, 1906. Eor tbe reasons given in McDuffie v. Railway, at tbis term, tbe plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and defendant\u2019s motion should have been granted. Let tbe action be dismissed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BbowN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Day, Bell & Allen and Womaclc, Hayes & Bynum for defendant.",
      "Plaintiff not represented in this Court."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "T. J. McDUFFIE and C. D. WOMACK v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY.\n(Filed 6 November, 1907).\nCivil actioN to recover a penalty, under Rule 9 of the Corporation Commission, for failure to furnish a car, tried before Webb, J., at August Term, 1907, of the Superior Court of Chatham County.\nErom the judgment rendered the defendant appealed.\nDay, Bell & Allen and Womaclc, Hayes & Bynum for defendant.\nPlaintiff not represented in this Court."
  },
  "file_name": "0399-01",
  "first_page_order": 439,
  "last_page_order": 440
}