{
  "id": 11272124,
  "name": "BURNETT v. KUYKENDALL et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burnett v. Kuykendall",
  "decision_date": "1908",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "597",
  "last_page": "597",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "146 N.C. 597"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 64,
    "char_count": 503,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "sha256": "593ecb0be89c0607411c7214305d6d905bbc29bf0b61c3c2444f73db5030ac45",
    "simhash": "1:d012fe0d30e5c28d",
    "word_count": 81
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:49:58.256488+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BURNETT v. KUYKENDALL et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PjjR. Oueiam:\nOn authority of decision (Lee v. Baird), and for reasons there given, appeal is dismissed for noncompliance with rule.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PjjR. Oueiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank Carter for plaintiff.",
      "Tucker & Murphy for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BURNETT v. KUYKENDALL et al.\nCivil actioN, tried before Cooke, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1907, of tbe Superior Court of Buncombe County.\nVerdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appealed.\nMotion in apt time by appellants to dismiss appeal for noncompliance with Eules 19 (subdiv. 2), 20 and 21.\nFrank Carter for plaintiff.\nTucker & Murphy for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0597-01",
  "first_page_order": 631,
  "last_page_order": 631
}