{
  "id": 11269939,
  "name": "F. B. PERRY v. WILLIAM PERRY, exr.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Perry v. Perry",
  "decision_date": "1908-04-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "367",
  "last_page": "368",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "147 N.C. 367"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1178,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.47,
    "sha256": "2b3b87e73cc498eccdfe839c050913baffcd65641bbb4ee3b4ac87be64e8ac4c",
    "simhash": "1:aa4304acc811b5b1",
    "word_count": 202
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:12.008409+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. B. PERRY v. WILLIAM PERRY, exr."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam :\nThis is an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, tried at October Term, 1907, of Waice Superior Court, his Honor B. F. Long, Judge presiding. The plaintiff recovered judgment for $125 for breach of a contract in respect to the cultivating of a crop on the testator\u2019s farm, from which defendant appealed.\nWe have examined and considered the several exceptions set out in the record to the reception and rejection of evidence, as well as to parts of his Honor\u2019s charge. The evidence discloses a controversy largely of fact and which appears to have been fairly and clearly presented to the jury, who have decided the matter adversely to the defendant, and we see no just reason to disturb the verdict. We find in the record no error of sufficient importance to warrant us in directing another trial.\nJudgment Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. G. Beckwith for plaintiff.",
      "Pede & Maynard for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. B. PERRY v. WILLIAM PERRY, exr.\n(Filed 15 April, 1908).\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Questions for Jury.\nWhen the examination of the record on appeal discloses a controversy largely of fact, fairly and clearly presented to the jury upon the law, the verdict will not be disturbed.\nB. G. Beckwith for plaintiff.\nPede & Maynard for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0367-01",
  "first_page_order": 405,
  "last_page_order": 406
}