{
  "id": 11270083,
  "name": "L. J. C. PICKLER and C. W. STEWART v. COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pickler v. County Board of Education",
  "decision_date": "1908-11-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "221",
  "last_page": "223",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "149 N.C. 221"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "141 N. C., 160",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 230,
    "char_count": 3470,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.469,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.228560434217261e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9142233775019316
    },
    "sha256": "34d875f3becf47d5ee73c000e44573bb84238ba96d30d84614bb5749ceabfc08",
    "simhash": "1:a93aa6100fa47052",
    "word_count": 572
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:43.519867+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. J. C. PICKLER and C. W. STEWART v. COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Clare, O. J.\nRev., sec. 4129, provides that the Comity Board of Education, upon whom is placed the duty of dividing the townships into school districts, \u201cshall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township.\u201d\nThe public school district of \u201cCherry Hill,\u201d Davie County, . was laid off, site bought and building erected 50 or 60 years ago.' It is now nearer than three miles to another public school. The building needing repairs, an effort was made to induce the defendant Board to remove the site and b\u00faild a new school house at another point a mile away. After hearing those in favor of and those opposed to the removal, the Board decided not to change the site, and instead of repairing, to build a new school building on the old site. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary restraining order which, on affidavits filed, and, after hearing, was dissolved by Judge Long.\nThere was no error. The duty of dividing the townships into school districts and the erection and maintenance of school buildings is left to the judgment of the School Board. Rev., secs. 4116, 4121, 4124. There being no allegation of misconduct, their action can not be supervised nor restrained by the courts unless in violation of some provision of the statutes. Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 160. It does not appear whether the other school house, \u201cnearer than three miles,\u201d was erected before, or since, this was erected at Cherry Hill 50 or 60 years ago. But, at any rate, the prohibition that the Board \u201cshall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township,\u201d cannot be construed to prohibit the Board from repairing, or building a new school house, on the site where a school has long been established.\nPending the appeal the new school house has doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide an abstract question. In any event the judgment dissolving the restraining order should be\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Clare, O. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Burton Qraige and Jacob Stewart for plaintiffs.",
      "E. L. Gaither and T. B. Bailey for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. J. C. PICKLER and C. W. STEWART v. COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.\n(Filed 19 November, 1908).\n1. Municipal Corporations \u2014 School Boards \u2014 Discretion\u2014School Districts.\nIn the absence of misconduct, or of violation of some provision of statute, the action of a school board in dividing townships into school districts and in the erection and maintenance of school buildings, cannot be supervised or restrained by the courts. Re-visal, secs. 4116, 4121, 4124.\n2. Municipal Corporations \u2014 School Districts \u2014 Discretion\u2014Rebuilding School-house \u2014 Proximity to Another School.\nWhen a school board, acting according to its judgment, without misconduct on its part, or in violation of some provision of statute, rebuilds a school-house on an old site,, though in less than three miles of some school already established, it is not a violation, of Revisal, 4129, providing that no new school shall be established within that distance of another.\n3. Injunction \u2014 Appeal\u2014Abstract Question.\nWhen pending an appeal from a judgment dissolving a restraining order the act sought to be restrained is accomplished, the Court will dismiss the appeal.\nActioN from Davie, beard by Long, J., 18 June, 1908j at Statesville, upon return to restraining order, issued by Moore, J. Plaintiffs appealed.\nBurton Qraige and Jacob Stewart for plaintiffs.\nE. L. Gaither and T. B. Bailey for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0221-01",
  "first_page_order": 255,
  "last_page_order": 257
}