{
  "id": 11271610,
  "name": "S. R. FOWLE & SON v. ALEX MITCHELL et als.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fowle v. Mitchell",
  "decision_date": "1908",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "581",
  "last_page": "581",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "149 N.C. 581"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 323,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.383,
    "sha256": "f7a134565dc12842ad3b6505e0b52f15e3091e021f729f30d4a422c940234d30",
    "simhash": "1:ad70287dd8609a0f",
    "word_count": 56
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:43.519867+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. R. FOWLE & SON v. ALEX MITCHELL et als."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Oueiam.\nMotion to docket and dismiss under Rule 17. Judgment At'as rendered 33 July, 1908, continuing a restraining order as an injunction to the hearing. Notice of appeal Avas served 6 August. No case on appeal is necessary. No transcript has been docketed.\nM otion allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. R. FOWLE & SON v. ALEX MITCHELL et als."
  },
  "file_name": "0581-03",
  "first_page_order": 615,
  "last_page_order": 615
}