{
  "id": 11275321,
  "name": "David Dickey, et al. v. John H. Alley, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dickey v. Alley",
  "decision_date": "1833-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "43",
  "last_page": "44",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "4 Dev. 43"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "15 N.C. 43"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1410,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.411,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.910444093458357e-08,
      "percentile": 0.46099637469211524
    },
    "sha256": "eb7fde8593dd10d7949f4f457bd1b175f379fdd211e601e52ba7a5a5862ac82d",
    "simhash": "1:37e41cf2cecece8d",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:49:44.411836+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "David Dickey, et al. v. John H. Alley, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Gaston, Judge.\nAfter stating the case as above, proceeded as follows: The case comes directly within the principles settled in the Justices of Pasquotank v. Shannonhouse. (ante 2 vol. p. 6,) and the Justices of Cumberland v. Armstrong, (ante 3 vol. p. 284,) and of other adjudications of this court. The judgment of nonsuit must be affirmed.\nPer Curiam \u2014 Judgment aeeirmedv",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Gaston, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No counsel appeared for the plaintiffs.",
      "Devereux for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "David Dickey, et al. v. John H. Alley, et al.\n\u00bf\u00ed sheriff's bond executed by an acting justice of the peace \u201c to A B, and the rest of the justices composing, &c.\u201d is void\nThe cases of the Justices v. Shamionhouse (ante 2 vol. p. 6,) and tho Justices v. Armstrong, (ante 3 vol. p. 284,) approved.\nDebt upon a bond given by the defendant Alley as principal, and several others as his sureties to \u201cDavid \u201c Dickey, chairman of the county court of Rutherford, \u201cand tho rest of the Justices composing said court,\u201d with a condition for the faithful discliage by Alley, of the duties of sheriff of that county.\nPie a \u2014 non est factum. \u2014 On the trial before his Honor Judge D anted at Rutherford, on the Fall circuit of 18 31, }\u2020 appeared that Abraham Crow, who was one of the obli-gors, was, at the time of his executing the bond, one of the justices of the peace composing the County Court of Rutherford. Upon this appearing bis Honor nonsuited the plaintiffs, who appealed.\nNo counsel appeared for the plaintiffs.\nDevereux for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0043-01",
  "first_page_order": 51,
  "last_page_order": 52
}