{
  "id": 11269893,
  "name": "GEORGE HYAMS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hyams v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1908-12-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "110",
  "last_page": "110",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 N.C. 110"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 480,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "sha256": "85293741f984f2866488874f6195db0887709cce06862a2a09fd181bbbb2685d",
    "simhash": "1:00ed3cb89103f43d",
    "word_count": 76
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:55:20.077008+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "GEORGE HYAMS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nWe have given this case most careful consideration, and are of opinion that no actionable negligence has been shown on the part of defendant, and the judgment below dismissing the action as on judgment of nonsuit is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Merrimon & Merrimon and Craig, Martin & Winston for plaintiff.",
      "Moore & Rollins for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "GEORGE HYAMS v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 22 December, 1908.)\nActioN tried before Peebles, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1908, of Buncombe.\nMerrimon & Merrimon and Craig, Martin & Winston for plaintiff.\nMoore & Rollins for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0110-01",
  "first_page_order": 154,
  "last_page_order": 154
}