{
  "id": 11270424,
  "name": "D. D. WAGNER v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wagner v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1909-03-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "215",
  "last_page": "216",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 N.C. 215"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1183,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "sha256": "f56ac99439d854e4164d0ab80f64188ebee0306af8e2828bf37ae9bd3caae02a",
    "simhash": "1:c4923cf2d4a90fb9",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:55:20.077008+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. D. WAGNER v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis case was before this Court on appeal at a former term and is reported in 141 N. 0., 315. On tbat appeal the Court refused to sustain -the defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, but sent tbe case back for a new trial on the ground of error in the charge of the judge. The facts before the Court on this appeal are practically identical with those on the former appeal, when the ease was fully reviewed in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Connor. The judge below, on the second trial, .appears to have followed the former decision very carefully, and we find no exception which presents anything new or necessary to discuss.\nNo Error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gilliam & Clark for plaintiff.",
      "John L. Bridgers for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. D. WAGNER v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY.\n(Filed 4 March, 1909.)\nThe facts on this appeal being practically the same as they were on a former appeal in the same ease, and the trial judge having followed the decision formerly rendered, the judgment is affirmed.\nActioN tried before W. R. Allen, J., and a jury, at November Term, 1908, of Edgecombe, to recover damages alleged to have been caused by defendant\u2019s negligence.\nDefendant appealed.\nGilliam & Clark for plaintiff.\nJohn L. Bridgers for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0215-01",
  "first_page_order": 259,
  "last_page_order": 260
}