{
  "id": 11272956,
  "name": "S. F. MAUNEY v. UNITED STATES LEATHER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mauney v. United States Leather Co.",
  "decision_date": "1909-05-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "791",
  "last_page": "791",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 N.C. 791"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 75,
    "char_count": 557,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "sha256": "f8c6e894778dc74df61f76e925513a27af5bd6e5dc69dddd58868951f035b772",
    "simhash": "1:80f07f833f19dd78",
    "word_count": 95
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:55:20.077008+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. F. MAUNEY v. UNITED STATES LEATHER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThe Court is of opinion, on examination of the-record in this appeal, that there is evidence of negligence to be submitted to the jury, and that the case was fairly presented by the judge in the court below. 1\nWe find nothing in the record which warrants a new trial.\nNo Error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hudgins, Watson & Johnston for plaintiff.",
      "Pless & Winborne and E. J. Justice for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. F. MAUNEY v. UNITED STATES LEATHER COMPANY.\n(Filed 13 May, 1909.)\nAction tried before Ferguson, J., and a jury, at September Term, 1908, of McDowell.\n\u2019Defendant appealed.\nHudgins, Watson & Johnston for plaintiff.\nPless & Winborne and E. J. Justice for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0791-02",
  "first_page_order": 835,
  "last_page_order": 835
}