#### STATE v. GEORGE GREEN.

(Filed 23 December, 1909.)

Indictment — Definiteness—Failure to Work Road — Proof—Motion in Arrest.

In this case tbe motion in arrest of judgment should have been allowed, tbe warrant being fatally defective in failing to allege that defendant was assigned to work tbe road, for tbe failure of which he was tried and convicted, and the prosecution failing to negative the payment of one dollar allowed by law in lieu of service. State v. Lunsford, 150 N. C., 862; State v. Neal, 109 N. 0., 858, cited and approved.

Appeal from Goolee, J., January Term, 1909, of FeaNKLIN.

Criminal prosecution for failure to work tbe public roads, beard on appeal from a justice’s court.

Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

Attorney-General and George L. J ones for tbe State.'

Defendant not represented in tbis Court.

Hoke, J.

We have recently held, in State v. Lunsford, 150 N. C., 862, that in every criminal prosecution, whether by indictment or warrant, or warrant taken in connection with tbe affidavit, tbe charge must be so stated as to show that a crime has been committed, and same must be described with sufficient certainty to inform tbe defendant of tbe nature of tbe accusation against him, and to enable tbe court to proceed to judgment in case of conviction.

In tbe present case, and under several decisions of tbe Court, tbe warrant is fatally defective in failing to allege that defendant was assigned to work tbe road described and failing to negative tbe payment of tbe one dollar allowed by the law in lieu of service. State v. Neal, 109 N. C., 859; State v. Baker, 106 N. C., 758; State v. Pool, 106 N. C., 698; State v. Smith, 98 N. C., 747. The motion of defendant, therefore, must be allowed and judgment against him arrested. Let tbis be certified.

Error.