{
  "id": 8654963,
  "name": "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GLOBE LUMBER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Caldwell Land & Lumber Co. v. Globe Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1909-12-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "390",
  "last_page": "391",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "151 N.C. 390"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1897,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.462,
    "sha256": "0fb5ea176ead6a7ba94a4e7c5621ee8eeddd7260ee43928a5627ba285186c9e0",
    "simhash": "1:ab60b9590613a637",
    "word_count": 320
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:26.349792+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GLOBE LUMBER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam :\nThe appellant abandons all exceptions except the second, which was to evidence as to the declaration of Gragg as to a certain maple being a corner in his boundary, and the seventh, as to a paragraph in the charge in regard to a pine corner in Gragg\u2019s line.\nIt is not necessary to consider these exceptions, for this controversy was submitted to the jury, not on the location of the Gragg line, but on the beginning corner of the Estes grant. It was admitted that if the beginning corner of the Estes grant was at \u201c30\u201d on the map, then the controverted territory was not covered by plaintiff\u2019s grant.\nUpon this view alone was the ease submitted to the jury. The jury have found such corner according to defendant\u2019s contention. The location of the Gragg line depended altogether on the location of the Est\u00e9s grant; the jury have located that, and the plaintiff admits of record that if the corner of the grant to Estes is at \u201c30,\u201d then it has no claim to the controverted territory.\nIf, therefore, any error has been committed, the plaintiff is in nowise prejudiced thereby.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. C.'Newland and Jones & Whisnant for plaintiff.",
      "Mark Squires and Lawrence Wakefield for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CALDWELL LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY v. GLOBE LUMBER COMPANY.\n(Filed 1 December, 1909.)\nDeeds and Conveyances \u2014 Title \u2014 Boundaries \u2014 Agreement of Parties \u2014 Evidence Immaterial.\nWhen, it is agreed, between tbe parties in a suit to establish title to land that tbe controversy depended upon tbe beginning corner of E. grant, and if so found tbe controverted territory would not be covered by plaintiff\u2019s grant, evidence of declarations for tbe purpose of establishing certain pine and maple corners of a grant to G. irrelevant.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., May Term, 1909, of Caldwell.\nAction for damages, to restrain tlie cutting of timber by defendant on lands .to which plaintiff claims title.\nW. C.'Newland and Jones & Whisnant for plaintiff.\nMark Squires and Lawrence Wakefield for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0390-01",
  "first_page_order": 434,
  "last_page_order": 435
}