{
  "id": 8655906,
  "name": "STATE v. CHARLIE PARISH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Parish",
  "decision_date": "1909-10-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "665",
  "last_page": "665",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "151 N.C. 665"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 557,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "fac1f2c6dd6ae62f2028c939ead74d44a7b80c2a64b71ee887a4394e220345bf",
    "simhash": "1:3865b1823e06c50d",
    "word_count": 93
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:26.349792+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CHARLIE PARISH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam :\nUpon an examination of the evidence in this case, we think there is an absence of any sufficient evidence tending to support the charge of an assault with intent to commit rape. In his argument, with his usual candor, the Attorney-General coincided with this view.\nNew trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General for the State.",
      "J. L. Barham for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CHARLIE PARISH.\n(Filed 27 October, 1909.)\nIn this case there was no evidence to sustain the conviction of the offense .charged.\nAppeal by defendant from W. R.-Allen, J., August Term, 1909, of WayNe.\nAttorney-General for the State.\nJ. L. Barham for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0665-01",
  "first_page_order": 709,
  "last_page_order": 709
}