{
  "id": 8655970,
  "name": "STATE v. BAXTER SHEMWELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Shemwell",
  "decision_date": "1909-11-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "694",
  "last_page": "695",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "151 N.C. 694"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1023,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.458,
    "sha256": "d209d3520e32438ba64270a67846c83f2d8f1a3fa95f20cca09e6984c37eda52",
    "simhash": "1:54fe13ae67300c48",
    "word_count": 170
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:26.349792+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WaleeR, J., dissenting."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BAXTER SHEMWELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Cueiam :\nThere is only one assignment of error set out in the brief of counsel for defendant, and that is directed to one clause in the charge of the court. Upon a careful examination of the entire evidence, and of the charge as a whole, we are convinced that the case was fairly presented to the jury, without any substantial error, and that they fully understood the questions submitted for their decision.\nWe find no reversible error \u2014 nothing which warrants us in ordering another trial.\nNo error.\nWaleeR, J., dissenting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Cueiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General and Gr. L. Jones for the State.",
      "Watson, Buxton & Watson, B. 0. Struckuiclc and W. P. Bynum,, Jr., for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BAXTER SHEMWELL.\n(Filed 11 November, 1909.)\nUpon examination of tile entire evidence and the charge as a whole, no error is found.\nAppeal by defendant from Long, J., February Term, 1909, of Guilford.\nIndictment for assault with a deadly weapon. Tbe defendant was convicted and sentenced to five months\u2019 imprisonment, from which judgment he appealed.\nAttorney-General and Gr. L. Jones for the State.\nWatson, Buxton & Watson, B. 0. Struckuiclc and W. P. Bynum,, Jr., for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0694-01",
  "first_page_order": 738,
  "last_page_order": 739
}