{
  "id": 8658043,
  "name": "M. E. Cozard et al. v. Henry M. McAden et al. (appellants)",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cozard v. McAden",
  "decision_date": "1909-12-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "743",
  "last_page": "743",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "151 N.C. 743"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 58,
    "char_count": 423,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "sha256": "b679427dfcb62558f2f836ab3ca96f1fd4e70afedde9cc266197d9f8347ad5b9",
    "simhash": "1:53f2f63a3b402254",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:26.349792+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "M. E. Cozard et al. v. Henry M. McAden et al. (appellants),"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "from Graham.\nPer Curiam,\nThe Court being evenly divided in opinion (Hoke, J., not sitting; Clark, C. J., and Manning, J., voting to affirm; Walker and Brown, JJ., voting to reverse), the judgment below stands affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Zebulon Weaver, J. D. Murphy, F. L. Johnson and T. A. Morphew for plaintiffs; Dillard & Bell and Merrick & Barnard for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "M. E. Cozard et al. v. Henry M. McAden et al. (appellants),\nDecember 23.\nZebulon Weaver, J. D. Murphy, F. L. Johnson and T. A. Morphew for plaintiffs; Dillard & Bell and Merrick & Barnard for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0743-03",
  "first_page_order": 787,
  "last_page_order": 787
}