{
  "id": 11272865,
  "name": "R. L. SMITH et al. v. F. J. FRENCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. French",
  "decision_date": "1909-03-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "754",
  "last_page": "754",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 N.C. 754"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "141 N. C., 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11251954
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/141/0001-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1347,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.45,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.23914637494309512
    },
    "sha256": "c0253d0fbba2a5ed0900c1c9f79874308df392956177e339d5a68a4ff292f2ed",
    "simhash": "1:a05b528139269376",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:47.463636+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. L. SMITH et al. v. F. J. FRENCH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case was before tbe Court at a former term, and is reported 141 N. C., 1.\nIssues were submitted by bis Honor, to wbicb we find no exception. While tbe form of tbe fourth issue is objectionable and somewhat indefinite, yet, taken in connection with tbe charge of tbe judge, we think tbe jury fully understood what was tbe real question submitted.\nThere is evidence in tbe record that plaintiffs\u2019 agent purchased a portion of tbe property at their own sale, thereby making plaintiffs accountable for its true value.\nWe have examined tbe several exceptions to tbe evidence and tbe charge and are of opinion that no substantial error was committed wbicb necessitates another trial.\nTbe judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moar\u00e9 & Dunn for plaintiff.",
      "E. M. Green and W. D.. Mclver for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. L. SMITH et al. v. F. J. FRENCH.\n(Filed 9 March, 1909.)\nIssues Objectionable \u2014 Harmless Error \u2014 Purchasers at Own Sale^-Aocountability.\nUpon examination of the record on appeal, no substantial error was found, when there was an issue to which there was no exception, being objectionable but clearly understood in connection with the charge, and evidence that plaintiffs\u2019 agent purchased \u2022 a part of the property at their own sale, making them accountable for its true value.\nAppeal by plaintiffs from 0. H. Allen, J., November Term, 1909, of CRAVEN.\nMoar\u00e9 & Dunn for plaintiff.\nE. M. Green and W. D.. Mclver for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0754-01",
  "first_page_order": 802,
  "last_page_order": 802
}