{
  "id": 11272989,
  "name": "G. O. HAIRE et al. v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Haire v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1910-04-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "764",
  "last_page": "764",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 N.C. 764"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "107 N. C., 686",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11274642
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/107/0686-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 N. C., 310",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11277663
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/85/0310-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "107 N. C., 686",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11274642
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/107/0686-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 N. C., 310",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11277663
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/85/0310-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 670,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.23914772637323642
    },
    "sha256": "07a3a6ff32b74eba18fadf44b41d1dd1618e3e48e3f503b2fbc8cd1564495aa3",
    "simhash": "1:1830d3396553b8d6",
    "word_count": 125
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:47.463636+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "G. O. HAIRE et al. v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CtjbiaM.\nUpon an examination of this record we find that the assignments of error all relate to the prayers for instruction and the charge of the court. '\nWe are of opinion that the charge is a clear exposition of the law as laid down in many decisions of this Court. Gunter\u2019s case, 85 N. C., 310; Dean\u2019s case, 107 N. C., 686.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CtjbiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. 0. Bowie and W. G. Fields for plaintiff.",
      "Watson, Buxton & Watson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "G. O. HAIRE et al. v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 27 April, 1910.)\nAppeal by defendant from Jones, J., at Fall Term, 1909, of Ashe.\nDisposed of under the opinions in Gunter\u2019s case, 85 N. C., 310;. and Dean\u2019s case, 107 N. C., 686.\nT. 0. Bowie and W. G. Fields for plaintiff.\nWatson, Buxton & Watson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0764-01",
  "first_page_order": 812,
  "last_page_order": 812
}