{
  "id": 11273005,
  "name": "A. STEINHAUSER v. JOHN G. WEBER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Steinhauser v. Weber",
  "decision_date": "1910-05-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "764",
  "last_page": "765",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 N.C. 764"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 1119,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.433,
    "sha256": "a84197f006488ff384ebb2fd88ee361df7d82f35a542945c72bd7fd9a620b1aa",
    "simhash": "1:50d6e739a33ba192",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:47.463636+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. STEINHAUSER v. JOHN G. WEBER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nUpon an examination of the record and assignments of error we are unable to find an error of sufficient importance to warrant another trial.\nThe questions at issue are almost entirely of fact and appear to have been fairly submitted to the jury.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cameron Morrison for plaintiff.",
      "Stewart & McRae, Osborne, Lucas & Cocke for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. STEINHAUSER v. JOHN G. WEBER.\n(Filed 4 May, 1910.)\nTlie issues in this case are almost entirely of fact, and upon examination of. the record and assignments' of error the judgment of the lower court is sustained.\nAppeal by defendant from Webb, J., at October Term, 1909, of MECKLENBURG.\nThese issues were submitted to the jury:\n1. Did the defendant unlawfully assault the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.\n2. Did the defendant willfully assault the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.\n3. Did the defendant maliciously assault the plaintiff, as alleged in th\u00e9 complaint? Answer: Yes.'\n4. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $300.\nFrom the judgment rendered defendant appealed.\nCameron Morrison for plaintiff.\nStewart & McRae, Osborne, Lucas & Cocke for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0764-02",
  "first_page_order": 812,
  "last_page_order": 813
}