{
  "id": 11273312,
  "name": "STATE v. B. F. POWELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Powell",
  "decision_date": "1910-02-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "840",
  "last_page": "840",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 N.C. 840"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 827,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.399,
    "sha256": "9f10a3a4778e6d8d1dd2579f26b4589b2be8fb1d7a95f4879f55396e25244e89",
    "simhash": "1:1f37c144cb8e0c49",
    "word_count": 139
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:47.463636+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. B. F. POWELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThe evidence in this case fully warranted the court in submitting the case to the jury. The only assignment of error relates to- the evidence of the State\u2019s witness, Eichard Ivey, for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching by his own declarations the defendant\u2019s witness, William Powell.\nWe do not deem it necessary to- pass on the exception, because, in view of all the evidence, it is not of sufficient importance- to warrant a new trial.\nThe judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General and George L. J ones for the State.",
      "U. L. Travis for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. B. F. POWELL.\n(Filed 25 February, 1910.)\nAppeal from Goolc, J., at September Term, 1909, of Halifax:.\nIndictment for incest of defendant in marrying his daughter and living with her in the marriage relation. The defendant was convicted, and appeals.\nAttorney-General and George L. J ones for the State.\nU. L. Travis for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0840-01",
  "first_page_order": 888,
  "last_page_order": 888
}