{
  "id": 11273339,
  "name": "STATE v. JOHN SMITH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1910-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "842",
  "last_page": "843",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 N.C. 842"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "145 N. C., 562",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 N. C., 613",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "107 N. C., 818",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11275128
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/107/0818-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "125 N. C., 695",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 N. C., 659",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655870
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/151/0659-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "141 N. C., 734",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11253943
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/141/0734-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "121 N. C., 603",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653658
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/121/0603-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 N. C., 390",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2085550
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/69/0390-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "77 N. C., 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8683182
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/77/0510-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 N. C., 500",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11274328
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/93/0500-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "103 N. C., 350",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650062
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/103/0350-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "110 N. C., 500",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11274048
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/110/0500-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "111 N. C., 637",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651947
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/111/0637-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "112 N. C., 856",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652133
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/112/0856-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "114 N. C., 830",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651589
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/114/0830-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1844,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.345815221000808e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6322009507117983
    },
    "sha256": "50057bb44bd06df5779b1e1e9247d0adef243935e4d0048089fe62814697efc0",
    "simhash": "1:3315746ed7be4362",
    "word_count": 355
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:29:47.463636+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JOHN SMITH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CubiaM.\nThe affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis is fatally defective, as it omits the averment that it is made \u201cin good faith,\u201d which is required by Rev., 3278. The appeal must be dismissed on motion as a'matter of right, not of discretion. S. v. Harris, 114 N. C., 830; S. v. Rhodes, 112 N. C., 856; S. v. Jackson, ib., 849; S. v. Shoulders, 111 N. C., 637; S. v. Wylde, 110 N. C., 500; S. v. Tow, 103 N. C., 350; S. v. Moore, 93 N. C., 500; S. v. Payne, ib., 612; S. v. Jones, ib., 617; S. v. Morgan, 77 N. C., 510; S. v. Divine, 69 N. C., 390, cited and approved. S. v. Bramble, 121 N. C., 603; S. v. Atkinson, 141 N. C., 734.\nIn S. v. Parish, 151 N. C., 659, the Court said: \u201cUnless the requirement of the statute, both as to time and to manner, are complied with, the appeal is not in this Court. The defect is jurisdictional, and we have no power to allow amendment, and the appellee has a right to have the appeal dismissed. S. v. Bramble, 121 N. C., 603; S. v. Gatewood, 125 N. C., 695, and numerous cases there cited.\u201d To same effect S. v. Duncan, 107 N. C., 818; S. v. Payne, 93 N. C., 613.\nIn S. v. Keebler, 145 N. C., 562, it is said: \u201cIn this State an appeal is a right, but not an absolute right. If the appeal bond is not given, or the proper certificate in lieu thereof, the appeal is dismissed.\u201d\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CubiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General for the State.",
      "J. 8. Grogan for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JOHN SMITH.\n(Filed 20 April, 1910.)\nAppeal and Error \u2014 Forma Pauperis \u2014 Averments- of Good Faith'\u2014 Defect Jurisdictional.\nThe omission in an affidavit. to appeal in forma pauperis of the averment that it was made \u201cin good faith\u201d is of a matter ' of jurisdiction; and the appeal must be dismissed on motion, as a matter of right, and is not one of discretion.\nAppeal by defendant from Long, J., at March (Special) Term, .1910, of Foesyth.\nAttorney-General for the State.\nJ. 8. Grogan for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0842-01",
  "first_page_order": 890,
  "last_page_order": 891
}