{
  "id": 11271101,
  "name": "PRUDEN and WINBORNE, Trustees, v. T. J. WHITE et als.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pruden v. White",
  "decision_date": "1910-09-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "28",
  "last_page": "29",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "153 N.C. 28"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 66,
    "char_count": 561,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.453,
    "sha256": "13f01453c59f5c96bc1d524a56a731d47c27dcfb9cc4e4b235a4d04328d050e8",
    "simhash": "1:14ee5136e22f6bcf",
    "word_count": 91
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:54.157289+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PRUDEN and WINBORNE, Trustees, v. T. J. WHITE et als."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:.\nWe have carefully examined and considered the records in both of these appeals and are of the opinion that substantial justice bas been done and 'that no reversible error appears. The judgment of the court is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed in both appeals.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stanley Winborne for plaintiffs;",
      "L. L. Smith for defendant White;",
      "Geo. Cowper for defendant Tayloe."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PRUDEN and WINBORNE, Trustees, v. T. J. WHITE et als.\n(Filed 14 September, 1910.)\nAppeal from George W. Ward, J., at the Spring Term, 1910, of Hertford.\n(DEFENDANTS WHITE AND TaYLOE APPEALED.)\nStanley Winborne for plaintiffs;\nL. L. Smith for defendant White;\nGeo. Cowper for defendant Tayloe."
  },
  "file_name": "0028-01",
  "first_page_order": 76,
  "last_page_order": 77
}